Setting Aside of Arbitral Award: Breach of Natural Justice and Prejudice
Master Mulia Sdn Bhd v Sigur Rus Sdn Bhd [2020] 9 CLJ 213

View PDF 19th November 2020 Issues Is the High Court bound to set aside an arbitral award under Section 37 of the Arbitration Act 2005 (“AA 2005”) once the Plaintiff…

Continue ReadingSetting Aside of Arbitral Award: Breach of Natural Justice and Prejudice
Master Mulia Sdn Bhd v Sigur Rus Sdn Bhd [2020] 9 CLJ 213

Arbitration: Set-off Across Multiple Contracts, Each With Its Own Arbitration Agreement
Pertama Ferroalloys Sdn Bhd v SAC TEC (Malaysia) Sdn Bhd
WA-24NCC(ARB)-2-01/2020

View PDF 15th July 2020IssuesAt times, a party may undertake several types of work under one project. This may result in multiple contracts being executed between parties, each for different…

Continue ReadingArbitration: Set-off Across Multiple Contracts, Each With Its Own Arbitration Agreement
Pertama Ferroalloys Sdn Bhd v SAC TEC (Malaysia) Sdn Bhd
WA-24NCC(ARB)-2-01/2020

EMPLOYMENT LAW: If a Fixed Term Employment Contract is Renewed Successively, is it In Reality a Permanent Employment?

View PDF INTRODUCTION In Malaysia companies / employers generally use two types of employment contract, i.e. (1) permanent contract of employment and (2) fixed term contract of employment. For the…

Continue ReadingEMPLOYMENT LAW: If a Fixed Term Employment Contract is Renewed Successively, is it In Reality a Permanent Employment?

CIPAA 2012 : Supporting Documents in Notice of Adjudication – To Include or Not to Include?
Masterplan Consulting Sdn Bhd v Motorola Solutions Malaysia Sdn Bhd [2020] 1 LNS 219

View PDF 2nd July 2020IssuesSection 8(1) of the Construction Industry Payment and Adjudication Act 2012 (“CIPAA 2012”) provides that-“A claimant may initiate adjudication proceedings by serving a written notice of…

Continue ReadingCIPAA 2012 : Supporting Documents in Notice of Adjudication – To Include or Not to Include?
Masterplan Consulting Sdn Bhd v Motorola Solutions Malaysia Sdn Bhd [2020] 1 LNS 219

Prior Notice Requirement, Condition Precedent and “Loss and Expense” Claim
Sunissa Sdn Bhd v Kerajaan Malaysia & Anor
[2020] MLJU 283

View PDF 22th May 2020 It is not unusual in the modern standard construction contract to contain a “prior notice requirement clause” as condition precedent before the contractor’s entitlement to…

Continue ReadingPrior Notice Requirement, Condition Precedent and “Loss and Expense” Claim
Sunissa Sdn Bhd v Kerajaan Malaysia & Anor
[2020] MLJU 283

Stay Pending Arbitration : Too late for Stay after Judgment in Default is entered?
[Tindak Murni Sdn Bhd v Juang Setia Sdn Bhd]
[03-2-11/2018(B) & 02(i)-104-11/2018(B)]

View PDF 8th April 2020 Issues There is an arbitration clause in the contract. A dispute arose between parties concerning the performance of contract. But for one reason or another,…

Continue ReadingStay Pending Arbitration : Too late for Stay after Judgment in Default is entered?
[Tindak Murni Sdn Bhd v Juang Setia Sdn Bhd]
[03-2-11/2018(B) & 02(i)-104-11/2018(B)]

Unconditional and Irrevocable Guarantees : Substance over label in restraining call on performance bond / guarantee
KNM Process Systems Sdn Bhd v Lukoil Uzbekistan Operating Company LLC W-02(C)(A)-1504-07/2018

View PDF 1st April 2020 Issues Since the Federal Court case of Sumatec Engineering & Construction Sdn Bhd v Malaysian Refining Company Sdn Bhd [2012] 3 CLJ 401 (“Sumatec”), the…

Continue ReadingUnconditional and Irrevocable Guarantees : Substance over label in restraining call on performance bond / guarantee
KNM Process Systems Sdn Bhd v Lukoil Uzbekistan Operating Company LLC W-02(C)(A)-1504-07/2018

CIPAA: Injunction to Restrain the Presentation of Winding Up Petition based on CIPAA Adjudication Decision
ASM Development (Kl) Sdn. Bhd v Econpile (M) Sdn Bhd
[Case No. WA-24NCC-363-07/2019]

View PDF 23th March 2020 INTRODUCTION Following the decision in the case of Likas Bay Precinct Sdn Bhd v Bina Puri Sdn Bhd [2019] 3 MLJ 244 [read our article…

Continue ReadingCIPAA: Injunction to Restrain the Presentation of Winding Up Petition based on CIPAA Adjudication Decision
ASM Development (Kl) Sdn. Bhd v Econpile (M) Sdn Bhd
[Case No. WA-24NCC-363-07/2019]

Limitation for Foreclosure Action: CIMB Bank Berhad v Sivadevi A/P Ivalingam [2019] 1 LNS 1904

INTRODUCTION Dwelling assets be it landed properties or high-rise apartments, their sale and purchase, are the most common assets transactions ordinarily involving vendors, purchasers and financiers. The financiers will usually…

Continue ReadingLimitation for Foreclosure Action: CIMB Bank Berhad v Sivadevi A/P Ivalingam [2019] 1 LNS 1904

Housing Development: The Legality of Extension of Time by Controller and its Legal Impact to Housing Developer – Ang Ming Lee & Ors v Menteri Kesejahteraan Bandar, Perumahan Dan Kerajaan Tempatan & Anor and Other Appeals [2019] 1 LNS 1741; [2019] MLJU 1346

INTRODUCTION The housing development in Malaysia is principally governed by the Housing Development (Control & Licensing) Act 1966 (“HDA”). One of the objectives of the HDA is to protect the…

Continue ReadingHousing Development: The Legality of Extension of Time by Controller and its Legal Impact to Housing Developer – Ang Ming Lee & Ors v Menteri Kesejahteraan Bandar, Perumahan Dan Kerajaan Tempatan & Anor and Other Appeals [2019] 1 LNS 1741; [2019] MLJU 1346

CIPAA Applies Prospectively, Not Retrospectively | (1) Jack-in-Pile (M) Sdn Bhd v Bauer (Malaysia) Sdn Bhd & Another Appeal [02(f)-58-07/2018(B) & 02(f)-59-07/2018(B)] | (2) Ireka Engineering & Construction Sdn Bhd v PWC Corporation Sdn Bhd & Other Appeals [02(f)-124-12/2018(W), 02(f)-125-12/2018(W) & 02(f)-126-12/2018(W)]

Introduction The Construction Industry Payment and Adjudication Act 2012 (“CIPAA”) came into force on 15.04.2014. CIPAA’s objective can be gleaned from its preamble:- “An Act to facilitate regular and timely…

Continue ReadingCIPAA Applies Prospectively, Not Retrospectively | (1) Jack-in-Pile (M) Sdn Bhd v Bauer (Malaysia) Sdn Bhd & Another Appeal [02(f)-58-07/2018(B) & 02(f)-59-07/2018(B)] | (2) Ireka Engineering & Construction Sdn Bhd v PWC Corporation Sdn Bhd & Other Appeals [02(f)-124-12/2018(W), 02(f)-125-12/2018(W) & 02(f)-126-12/2018(W)]

CIPAA: Direct Payment from Principal when the Losing Party was wound up? – CT Indah Construction Sdn Bhd v BHL Gemilang Sdn Bhd (Civil Appeal No: W-02(C)(A)-2056-10/2017)

03 December 2019 Introduction When a Claimant successfully obtained an Adjudication Decision in its favour, CIPAA offers 3 methods to enforce of the Adjudication Decision, where the successful Claimant may:-…

Continue ReadingCIPAA: Direct Payment from Principal when the Losing Party was wound up? – CT Indah Construction Sdn Bhd v BHL Gemilang Sdn Bhd (Civil Appeal No: W-02(C)(A)-2056-10/2017)

Condition Precedent : Stay Pending Mediation – Ohpen Operations UK Limited v Invesco Fund Managers Limited [2019] EWHC 2246 (TCC)

04th September 2019 Issues It is not uncommon for dispute resolution clauses to provide for escalation mechanism or mediation as a precursor to full-blown dispute resolution, either in the civil…

Continue ReadingCondition Precedent : Stay Pending Mediation – Ohpen Operations UK Limited v Invesco Fund Managers Limited [2019] EWHC 2246 (TCC)

End of content

No more pages to load